An unnamed Italian woman is suing her husband after spending seven years living under a Fifty Shades of Grey-style sexual contract.
The saleswoman from Padua was 24 when she signed a bizarre contract promising total sexual and mental submission to her ‘padrone’ and husband, who is ten years her senior.
 |
| Image courtesy of handbag.com |
She signed a freaking contract! She agreed to submit to him and do everything he wanted her to do!
After their relationship broke down, the woman has been able to use their sexual contract as evidence of physical and emotional abuse during the marriage. The husband, now aged 41, argues that she signed the pact entirely of her own free will and that the activities were always consensual.
It is now up to a prosecutor, Sergio Dini, to decide whether the wife can reasonably claim physical abuse, or whether her accusations should be dismissed on the basis that she signed a contract detailing her husband's extreme tastes in the bedroom.
One would think that Dominants are the ones capable of screwing over their subs, apparently, this isn't always the case. A subs still has the power to ruin a Dominant's life.
Is that contract legal? If it is, maybe he could sue her for breach of contract. I'm just saying...
I wonder if we can all sue the author of 'Fifty Shades of Grey' for associating our entire community with that one horrible book.
ReplyDeleteHahahaha! No comment.
ReplyDeleteI have to say it does look like she's screwing over the husband, as you say Miss. Seven years is a LONG time to submit to something you don't want to - especially after the contract.
ReplyDeleteTo me it feels wrong just to have the husband as the Dom. It's just because of my own preferences, but a guy being in charge seems all kinds of crazy to me.
To each his own.
ReplyDeleteI think she thought she was submissive or she would be able to take whatever was done to her. Maybe she's really vanilla but agreed to do things for her husband to make him happy or to keep the marriage intact.
Yeah, it's very hard to say who's right and wrong in a case like this without knowing the details and the people.
ReplyDeleteStill though.