I've learned a new concept today: Ruined Orgasm. I am aware of this but only in the vanilla context. I read a few posts on Orgasm Denial about this and I is another way of controlling someone's orgasm or part of orgasm denial.
According to Wikipedia:
This practice allows the physical release of sexual climax while denying or minimizing the satisfaction and pleasure associated with orgasm. Stimulation is provided to the moment orgasm is inevitable, and then stopped by breaking all physical contact with the genitals just as orgasm begins (i.e. past the "edge"). Non-erotic or nonsexual distractions may also be introduced at this point, which can include undesirable pain or unpleasant smells or discussion of prosaic, unrelated topics.
I think ass kisser and I practiced this, sort of. When we have sex, I would order him to stop before he comes. It was very hard for him to do this since he had to stop a lot. Since I don't cum through coitus, it would take hours before I let him cum. There were even times I would tell him to stop so we could go out to for shopping or do some errands together. I'm not sure if I ruined his orgasms at all but I did control them.
I may have done this to someone last year. He was not in good shape (he was sick) but we pushed on to meeting and playing a bit.... Hmmmm... I'll just keep the details to my self. Hahaha!
Thanks for the hello! That made me double-take.
ReplyDeleteYou are pretty much correct about ruined orgasms. I've experienced a few, either by accident or done them to myself to try out. I think they would be hard to inflict on somebody else, because you have to stop touching at just the right moment... the moment after the orgasm is inevitable but before there is any pleasure.
The result is that the guy ejaculates (usually quite slowly) and loses his erection but doesn't lose any of his frustration or excitement. So he badly wants to cum again. It's not pleasant!
Hi Charles.
ReplyDeleteI like your explanation. If I were incorrect, would you correct me? ;-)
Unfortunately for me, I probably would. xD
ReplyDeleteIt's an orgasm without any satisfaction or pleasure. Afterwards there is a lot of discomfort and thrusting around, getting desperate for some touch. Provided the guy is 'good' or his hands are tied, the frustration is crazy.
The argument about whether it's better or worse than no orgasm at all still continues!
Well it's still another way of controlling a sub's orgasm so if it's better or worse than no orgasm would depend on the person's experience.
ReplyDeleteYou are giving me ideas here. Hahahaha!
Well then I should shut up about it! Im still of the 'worse' opinion. ;)
ReplyDeleteAnd by the way - this is an interesting blog. I like it. Thanks.
Thank you for visiting and posting comments. I really appreciate it.
ReplyDeleteI visited yours by the way and posted a comment.
Thank you. No need to thank me, though - I just enjoyed reading, and would like to stay for the updates. :)
ReplyDeleteAnd have fun with your new discovery! lol
ReplyDelete